Skip to main content

Thread: The Demonoid quandry?


i noticed thread called demonoid, closed review yesterday, due (i expect) fact demonoid user gave out number of invite codes people use become demonoid members.

reason suspect this, codes have been edited out of post.

so, demonoid user, know first hand large number of distros available via demonoid; demonoid give access lot of legal data. there number of freely available software & other data accessed via demonoid .torrent search engine.

new versions of ubuntu, land on demonoid incredibly after release. there in such efficient manner have wondered whether ubuntu administration puts torrents @ demonoid take load of own servers?
though in reality expect due efficiency of demonoid's connection .torrent distribution network.

though, contentious question arises because .torrent search engine lists illegal downloads legal downloads, should ubuntu forums consider use of, or promotion of use of demonoid (in example) inherently illegal activity?

think not, individual user of demonoid or other .torrent search engine or don't up/download.

why should rare inclusion of demonoid (in example) invitation codes considered illegal, when legally free software available/accessible on demonoid database?

made poll see guys/gals think how ubuntu forums should deal .torrent search engine talk in said forum.

most don't use "good" though. not in holy land of ubuntuforums.org


Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Community Discussions Forum Feedback & Help The Demonoid quandry?


Ubuntu

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode - Raspberry Pi Forums

class MPU6050 has no member named begin

missing filename after '-o'